Paul Adrian Fried / HAMLET'S BIBLE

In Shakespeare’s Henry V (F1), "Hostesse" describes the death of Falstaff (2.3.832-847), claiming not that Falstaff is in heaven in the bosom of Abraham (like the beggar Lazarus of Luke 16:19-31), but in the bosom of Arthur. She also offers: "his Nose was as sharpe as a Pen, and a Table of greene fields." (2.3.838-9) Adam Roberts [1] notes:  - Lewis Theobald (1733) "amends Table to babbled, giving us: ‘his nose was as sharp as a pen and [he] babbled of green fields’."  - Most editions follow Theobold, but Gary Taylor’s Oxford edition considers other options. Dobson notes that the RSC edition (eds. Bate and Rasmussen) make it ‘for his nose was as sharp as a pen on a table of green fields.’ [2]  Mark Alcamo offers that "Nose" might have at least a double meaning, both literal and also that his "knows" (his knowing) was sharp at his death [3]. Roberts considers that "table" might also mean "tableau," image. Roberts and ...

When Lear speaks with Cordelia in 5.3 of being "God's spies" [1], this draws on a common trope, which activates a kind of cognitive framing. The trope is present in the tale to which Ophelia alludes in Hamlet 4.5: “the owl was a baker’s daughter,” a tale about Jesus or a fairy in disguise as a beggar at the baker’s door.  It is also present when Henry V (in 4.1) moves disguised among his troops on the eve of the Battle of Agincourt, and when Hamlet in 5.1 does not at first reveal to the gravedigger that he is the “mad” prince [2]: Sermons urged that monarchs should be obeyed like God’s representatives on earth, but king and prince purposefully conceal their identities, like spies. The trope was in medieval tales: King Arthur goes among his people disguised [3], as he does centuries later in Mark Twain's novel, A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court (1889). Shakespeare was fond of Ovid’s Metamorphoses in which the gods Zeus and Hermes, disguised like spi...

The word “Herod” [1] occurs NINE times in Shakespeare, in four plays:  Once in in 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘔𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘺 𝘞𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘞𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘴𝘰𝘳;  twice in 𝘏𝘢𝘮𝘭𝘦𝘵 (“out-herod’s Herod,” 3.2.14-15, and given the name of the player queen, “Baptista,” also a nod to Herod Antipas [2], who had John the Baptist beheaded for condemning his incestuous marriage);  and once in 𝘏𝘦𝘯𝘳𝘺 𝘝 as a reference to Herod the Great’s slaughter of innocents:  “Your naked infants spitted upon pikes Whiles the mad mothers with their howls confused Do break the clouds, as did the wives of Jewry At Herod’s bloody-hunting slaughtermen (3.3.38-41). “Herod” occurs five times in 𝘈𝘯𝘵𝘰𝘯𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘊𝘭𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘢𝘵𝘳𝘢 (Cleopatra lived at the same time as Herod the Great.) In the second scene, a servant says, “Let me be married to 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 in a forenoon, and widow them all: let me have a child at fifty, to whom 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗼𝗱 of Jewry may do homage.” (1.2.27-30) We hear not only “Herod” bu...

How can good be distilled from evil? How can sin turn to grace?  GOOD FROM EVIL IN HENRY V (1599):  In Shakespeare's Henry V , Act 4, Scene 1 (Folger), King Henry says something that some readers and audience members may find strange: "There is some soul of goodness in things evil, Would men observingly distil it out. We should note that this is not at all the same as arguing that evil means can and should be used to achieve good ends: As they say, the ends do not justify the means; but this statement by Henry is very different. Given that Henry was a kind of prodigal son, it seems Henry himself is living evidence that good can be distilled from evil: Perhaps the time he spent with Falstaff not only corrupted him for a time, but also helped him understand aspects of himself, and a wider range of his subjects, better, and therefore made him a better king. Henry's time as a prodigal son was not chosen as an evil means to achieve a good end: He chose to be prodigal...

In 2019, Shakespeare Magazine from the UK published a short piece called, " All Crowns are Hollow: The scheming and backstabbing politicians of today would do well to ponder the fate of Shakespeare’s Kings ." [Image from The Hollow Crown , British TV series, via Wikipedia . Fair use.] The piece includes the observation, "Very few of the kings in Shakespeare ever get to do any actual ‘kinging’. Instead they fight tooth and nail to get to the throne – often committing heinous crimes like murder in the process – and then they die." While the title of this piece points to some usefulness for "scheming and backstabbing politicians of today," we might also consider how Shakespeare's plays reflect the playwright's (and his time's?) attitudes and skepticism about monarchs. Many of Shakespeare's monarchs are shown in a bad light: - Macbeth... - Richard II is a poor king, deposed. - Henry IV: The Biblical King David did not want to kill...

Shakespeare uses “lazar” only six times, all before Elizabeth I’s death: once in 1 Henry IV , written in 1596-7 ("Lazarus," 4.2, discussed last week) ; twice in Henry V , written in 1599; once in Hamlet , written in 1599-1601 (1.5, "lazar-like"); and twice in Troilus and Cressida, 1600-2. Three evoke Biblical contexts: the ghost in Hamlet , Falstaff in 1 Henry IV , the Archbishop of Canterbury in Henry V . The other three come are comic insults from Pistol (an ensign serving under Falstaff) and Thersites, (a slave serving Ajax, then Achilles, in Troilus and Cressida). [L: Pistol, with Henry V in disguise, illustration by H. C. Selous, c.1864-68, from The Plays of William Shakespeare , edited/annotated by Charles and Mary Cowden Clarke; image public domain via ShakespeareIllustration.org . R: Thersites and Achilles, illustration by H. C. Selous, c.1886, from Cassell's illustrated Shakespeare, v 3, p 20. Edited and annotated by Charles and Mary Cowden Clarke. ...