WHY SWOUNDS in Hamlet 2.2 and 5.1? Third Commandment (Series)
WHY "SWOUNDS" in Hamlet 2.2 and 5.1? Third Commandment (series) In recent posts in this series, I offered that perhaps there are good reasons why Shakespeare has characters use specific “minced oaths” such as “Marry” (Mary, mother of Jesus) [1], or “God’s Bodkins” (God’s little bodies, or Eucharist) [2], even if in so doing they violate the third commandment against taking in vain the name of God (or other holy persons or things) [3]. In 2.2 and 5.1, Hamlet uses the minced oath “Swounds,” or in other words, “Christ’s wounds” or “God’s wounds,” a popular focus of medieval and even renaissance piety (see image notes). Why does he use "Swounds" in these two scenes, instead of any number of others used elsewhere in the play [4] by Hamlet or other characters? Both of these scenes either use more violent rhetoric, or foreshadow stronger physical violence, so associating the moment with “Swounds” makes sense: In 2.2, Hamlet speaks only to himself, but scolds himself ...